Author Topic: Super awesome vintage weber kettle (Read 30124 times)

Troy · « **Reply #15 on:** August 04, 2012, 08:33:59 PM »

fantastic info

with only one vent, it wouldn't get very hot at all

rmayeur · « **Reply #16 on:** August 05, 2012, 02:52:00 AM »

Well,,,, 5:30 AM,,, woke up several times thinking about my last post, 3 vents on my kettle, I sometimes think of an image upside down when its late, it's that metal plate in my head, they should have instaled?@##@% But I'm getting my day started now, afternoon nap!
Sorry for the incorect post.

Troy · « **Reply #17 on:** August 05, 2012, 07:15:43 AM »

oh ok

not a problem. I was mostly excited about having new information

thanks for updating us. sorry if you lost sleep.

Duke · « **Reply #18 on:** August 06, 2012, 08:49:13 AM »

Interesting, can you possibly share a picture of the bottom?

Craig · « **Reply #19 on:** August 08, 2012, 06:32:37 PM »

That is awesom! It looks to be the color of a picture I found online of a copper mist one from the 1950s. I have to relearn how to post pictures here. -Craig

Troy · « **Reply #20 on:** August 08, 2012, 06:52:49 PM »

Quote from: husker_red on August 08, 2012, 06:32:37 PM

That is awesom! It looks to be the color of a picture I found online of a copper mist one from the 1950s. I have to relearn how to post pictures here. -Craig

to the best of my knowledge, this one is a copper mist from the 50s!

For posting pictures, it's best to use a free image host like imageshack

Craig · « **Reply #21 on:** August 08, 2012, 06:57:06 PM »

Hope this works. This is the picture I was talking about.

-Craig

Troy · « **Reply #22 on:** August 08, 2012, 07:09:03 PM »

oh neat. that one almost looks pink!

Like this one.

Duke · « **Reply #23 on:** August 10, 2012, 06:23:06 AM »

Isn't it called chestnut?

Craig · « **Reply #24 on:** August 10, 2012, 06:32:12 AM »

Since we're talking about a 1950s (pre disc) kettle, it would appear that they went a short time with just bare legs?? Pre Triangle pan? As evident in this anniversary picture seen on the product this year. I love the foil laid out on the one to the left

Craig

Troy · « **Reply #25 on:** August 10, 2012, 08:05:31 AM »

Quote from: husker_red on August 10, 2012, 06:32:12 AM

Since we're talking about a 1950s (pre disc) kettle, it would appear that they went a short time with just bare legs?? Pre Triangle pan? As evident in this anniversary picture seen on the product this year. I love the foil laid out on the one to the left

Craig

interesting.
it's possible that the demo units were slightly different than the ones being sold.
The salesmen did have to travel with them and all.

Duke · « **Reply #26 on:** September 07, 2012, 07:40:28 PM »

One has to wonder what the men pictured were using for charcoal.

Craig · « **Reply #27 on:** September 07, 2012, 08:43:13 PM »

The look on the guys face on the right is kind of creepy!

Craig

zavod44 · « **Reply #28 on:** September 08, 2012, 09:44:15 AM »

Well I don't know if you noticed but if you look close the guy on the right... is cooking a human heart....... Ermagherd!

Brian

Heyjude · « **Reply #29 on:** September 08, 2012, 05:20:46 PM »

My guess is that the legs are solid or tube steel and didn't fall out.
Then someone had to solve the ash or potential fire problem. Somewhre aluminum legs made snse from a cost standpoint.
Either way, that guy is kinda creepy..