Im starting to think the catalog we all know as being from 64 is actually from 65. The cover is identical to the 66 and we know that is from 1966. Would Weber use the same cover for three years? Also thinking Craig is on to something with thisQuoteCould be 63 MTH pointed away from vent, 1964 MTH pointed at the vent, 1965 first wood.??
Could be 63 MTH pointed away from vent, 1964 MTH pointed at the vent, 1965 first wood.??
QuoteAs for live MTH-> Harris had one, Grandpa is one, who else has a MTH->MTH-> points at the ventMe...
As for live MTH-> Harris had one, Grandpa is one, who else has a MTH->MTH-> points at the vent
The one i have says C-65 on it so I would assume that's a legit 1965, the one that says "new for 62" is legit, the others? Who knows
QuoteThe one i have says C-65 on it so I would assume that's a legit 1965, the one that says "new for 62" is legit, the others? Who knows63, 66, 68, 72, 73, 79, and 81 (only scans I have) all have the dates on the back.
That's the one....the date is on the lower left corner of the last page, just beneath and left of the fireplace.
QuoteI just want to say this is the most fun I have had here in a long time. And I just want to say it is fun watching this all go down. I don't think any other group of people on the planet would be able to resurrect the kind of information discussed in the last 6 pages of this post. Fascinating.Winz
I just want to say this is the most fun I have had here in a long time.
FWIW - Westerner story, claiming that the parents bought it new in 1958.http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2482&dat=20040616&id=SppIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=TQoNAAAAIBAJ&pg=5913,137093Winz