Greetings all. I am pondering the mysteries of life. (A very limited aspect of it, anyway.)
I've done some finagling to get my hands on a modern 26er... but that is all in process, and it is not yet in my possession. It will be this weekend. So, I'm daydreaming about what to buy for it. ;-)
I am hoping there is someone out there with EXPERIENCE on the topic of SnS use in a 26er, with a 22" standard version vs. the XL. (I did a search, and can't really find a lot of discussion on the topic of 'comparisons' in a 26er.)
I've got an SnS+... and am considering buying a SnS XL. However, I'm also 'kinda' considering selling the SnS+, and buying an SnS 2.0 (and probably losing $30 in the process), and calling that 'good enough.' OR... just sticking with the SnS+, and not spending more $$$. (I do want to always keep a 22" SnS for use in 22" kettles.)
With the incoming 26er, I'm wondering whether an XL would be overkill. I assume most of the time, the SnS+ will probably be "fine" though perhaps not "the best."
I usually use my SnS+ in one of my 22s to cook 2 zone (with steaks and chicken breasts). I'm relatively new to smoking... and have done ribs about 6 times. I have yet to do any smoking cooks with the SnS longer than the 5ish hour rib cooks I've done. (I also own a 22" WSM, and probably won't sell it... so for a brisket, etc., I'd likely go with that.)
SO:
The benefits of the SnS XL would be a larger sear zone, and longer burn times. I don't know that I'll necessarily do longer cooks on the 26er (as I have the WSM). I assume the SnS XL won't be a significant enough upgrade in the 26er to justify the cost for the larger sear zone benefit alone. Can I justify the expenditure to an XL for a larger sear zone alone? (Probably not?)
That's where I wish I had the 2.0. For the 2 zone cooking... without the water (the normal 2 zone cooking), I'd already have a "larger sear zone." I'd be getting a bigger sear zone in the 22" compatible SnS, and it would seem to be a good compromise.
The flip side... like many of us, of course, I want the 26er setup to be "ideal," even though I've got other options (the WSM). If we didn't like our toys... we wouldn't be on a grill forum. We'd just have a grill, and we'd just cook on it. ;-)
Anyone with substantial experience with a 26" kettle, and the SnS XL vs 'standard' SnS (+ or 2.0)? Recommendations? Is the XL a mind-blowing experience with the 26er? Or would you be perfectly happy with just the standard size SnS? (Particularly if you owned a WSM?)
Thoughts? Advice?
Thanks
p.s. Of course, assessing this as a "need" based issue isn't quite accurate, I get it. I don't "need" anything more than a 22" kettle and the SnS I've already got. I'm just trying to assess whether it's really getting borderline silly to buy the XL when I already own a standard size.