Welcome, Guest

Shop Amazon.com and support the WKC | WKC T-Shirts

Author Topic: RIBS: SL vs BB  (Read 742 times)

clarissa

  • WKC Brave
  • Posts: 277
RIBS: SL vs BB
« on: June 01, 2017, 08:43:44 AM »
I bought some St Louis Ribs today and it will be my first time making them. Do I go slow indirect like I do for Baby Backs? Do they get more tender the longer they cook or do I need to cook them faster? 

Travis

  • WKC Ambassador
  • Posts: 6537
RIBS: SL vs BB
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2017, 08:48:06 AM »
Spares take longer than BB's. They have more fat content. You can do them both either way. If you have all day to chill and enjoy, I like lownslow. If you don't have all day, roll em' hotnfast. Both ways are good and always fun to expirement


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1buckie

  • WKC Ambassador
  • Posts: 9048
Re: RIBS: SL vs BB
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2017, 09:17:51 AM »
They are basically like full spare ribs, just with the headbone, or rib tips, cut off.....the left 1/3 in this pic....



I like a middle-of-the-road temp, say 260~275f, at Meat Level (<<Technical Term)



Here's a possible setup that would go about like that:




Start w/ the flat over the un-burnt coals & rotate a few times (just slide the grate around) during the cook........




Likely be somewhere around 3-1/2 hours (or about that) 'till you get a good bend test.....

"If you want it fancy there is BBQ spray paint at home depot for that. "
    Covered, damper-controlled cooking.....IF YOU PLEASE !!!
           "But the ever versatile kettle reigned supreme"